That’s about to change, we have but one tool at our disposal, a tool even more powerful than social worker’s having their day in court against hapless families, that tool is The Internet a machine so vast it covers the globe in seconds. If you have been on the end of “their justice” it is more than likely you have nothing more to loose, please feel at liberty to tell it like it really is, name all involved, Say NO to gagging orders, how dare they!
It is crucial to notice that the proposed revision of marriage laws involves exactly that: a revision of marriage.
In order to offer the status of marriage to couples of the same sex, the very meaning of marriage has to be changed.
Create a profile on one of the many social networking sites, they can't afford to close them all, you will have maximum impact!
The more information you provide the more they will want to close the site, the more they want to close it the more mirror sites will appear with all the same information on them, this will hurt them make no mistake, they won't like the publicity and like we care?
Wisely, our politicians don't listen to surveys on that issue (and I agree with them).
They should exercise leadership, not follow opinion.In which case, what same-sex couples will have will not be the same as what differently sexed couples now have.It will be called marriage, but it won't be marriage as we know it.Could it be that if you haven't heard the case opposing a change to the marriage law, it is because the language of those advocating it has been so emotive that the contrary case can't be heard above the noise?Could it really be said that a civil disagreement has taken place? I would like to make the case for traditional marriage as being between one man and one woman; but to do so with some important qualifications.He has said: It's time for our laws to reflect the values of modern Australia and to include everyone as equals ... And these same terms make opposing a redefinition of marriage sound primitive and even barbaric.